Problem with fritzbox and big preset

[Marco Marino]

Thank you for your support. So, if I have to read a particular parameter, I
can use

let model = declare("InternetGatewayDevice.DeviceInfo.ModelName", {value:
1}).value[0];   <-- with { value:1 }


What if I have to set a parameter??
for example:

declare("
InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.1.WANPPPConnection.1.Name",
{value: 1}, {value: "Internet"});

is this correct? What is the correct value of the second parameter in this
case?


-Marco






2017-10-04 20:18 GMT+02:00 Dan Morphis <dan at milkcarton.com>:

> GenieACS handles invalidating the Mongo/Redis cache. Trying to manage this
> yourself will cause perf issues.
>
>
> The wildcard in paths causes the GPN requests so Genie knows what
> parameters exist. In your declare statements, use {value: 1} as the second
> parameter. If you use {value: Date.now()} then Genie will do fresh GPN
> requests. Ex:
>
> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.LANDevice.1.WLANConfiguration.*.PossibleChannels",
> {value: 1}); //Once we have the list of Possible WLAN channels, there is no
> need to refresh those values again.
>
>
> The second parameter to declare causes the declare statement to happen if
> the timestamp value is newer than the current value. So value: 1 means only
> do GPN/GPV/SPV if we we don't know about this parameter (or its value in
> the case of GPV/SPV).
>
> -dan
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Marco Marino <marino.mrc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I'm sorry if I use an old post, but... Zaid can you give me an
>> example? Actually the problem remains and I'm searching for a solution.
>> What do you me with implicit and explicit commit calls? Basically it seems
>> that if I use wildcard (*) in paths when I set some value, this generates a
>> lot of getParameterNames.... should I avoid to use wildcards? Sometimes
>> happens that the device hangs during the first provision script execution
>> and after the CPE becomes unstable. Is there some "cache" in mongo/redis
>> that I have to flush before re-try to execute the provisioning script?
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> 2017-08-09 7:17 GMT+02:00 Zaid Abdulla <zaid at genieacs.com>:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 11:23 +0200, Marco Marino wrote:
>>> > So, my question is: can I add some kind of "pause" between operations
>>> > in a preset?
>>>
>>> You can create a vparam to keep state info and timestamp and compare
>>> against Date.now(). However, if you're getting endless_cycle fault then
>>> you can probably fix this by minimizing the number of implicit and
>>> explicit commit calls.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Zaid Abdulla <zaid at genieacs.com>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.genieacs.com
>>> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.genieacs.com
>> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.genieacs.com/pipermail/users/attachments/20171006/9c3ee2a7/attachment-0001.html>