<!DOCTYPE html>
<html><head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head><body><p>Boden,</p><p>I've created a pull request in github which adds this feature.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/zaidka/genieacs/pull/222">https://github.com/zaidka/genieacs/pull/222</a></p><p>If this would be helpful to anyone else, please let me know.</p><p>Thanks,<br>Spence</p><blockquote type="cite">On March 31, 2017 at 9:27 AM Boden Garman <bpgarman@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi Spencer,<br><br></div>I think that would useful, we often have issues where a connection request fails.<br><br></div>Cheers,<br></div><div>Boden<br></div><br></div><div class="ox-90f4310e8f-gmail_extra"><br><div class="ox-90f4310e8f-gmail_quote">On 31 March 2017 at 11:44, Spencer Lambert <<a href="mailto:spence@isphelper.com" target="_blank">spence@isphelper.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote>Some of my CPEs ignore Connection Requests if they come in too fast, like more than one in 15 seconds. I think it's a protection against attacks. Do any of you have this issue? It's frustrating because tasks end up sitting until the next periodic inform, which is usually hours.<br> <br> I've used some commercial ACS' and they have a background process that re-tires the CPE connection. After a first initial failed request to check in for tasks, every 30-60 seconds this background watcher will re-ask the CPE to check, giving up after five minutes or so.<br> <br> Would a background task watcher be useful to any of you?<br> <br> I've coded up a simple fix for my installation and I'm wondering if it would be worth working on a proper pull request.<br> <br> Thanks,<br> Spence<br> ______________________________<wbr/>_________________<br> Users mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Users@lists.genieacs.com">Users@lists.genieacs.com</a><br> <a href="http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.genieacs.com/<wbr/>mailman/listinfo/users</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></body></html>