GenieACS in

Alexei Pastuchov info at
Wed Mar 16 16:03:26 EDT 2016

Thank you all for your replays.

STUN is mandatory requirement in our case because CWMP-Client doesn't support


> On 16 March 2016 at 20:07 Zaid Abdulla <zaid at> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 13:05 +0100, Alexei Pastuchov wrote:
> > Actually GenieACS doesn't match the requirements because lack of NAT-
> > Support. But it looks like Notification-based Approach (G.
> >
> > 5.pdf ) could be done with justifiable effort and I consider to
> > contribute to the GenieACS project in this way. I'll gladly support
> > you if you are working on the solution already.
> We prioritize features based mainly on the needs of our the needs of
> our commercial clients and, to a lesser extent, popular demand from the
> community. This is not requested often and since it's deprecated in the
> latest amendment, the new XMPP based approach will likely be
> implemented first. Having said that, we'd gladly take your money to
> implement it :) Or you may implement it yourself and I can provide my
> feedback when needed.
> > Does any ISP use GenieACS in business production environment already?
> > If so, which kind of CPE you company uses?
> I have no record of how many production deployments are out there. But
> we do manage quite a few ourselves. If GenieACS meets your
> requirements, then you have nothing to worry about in that regard.
> Zaid

More information about the Users mailing list