Background Task Watcher

[Boden Garman]

Hi Spencer,

I think that would useful, we often have issues where a connection request
fails.

Cheers,
Boden


On 31 March 2017 at 11:44, Spencer Lambert <spence at isphelper.com> wrote:

> Some of my CPEs ignore Connection Requests if they come in too fast, like
> more than one in 15 seconds.  I think it's a protection against attacks.
> Do any of you have this issue?  It's frustrating because tasks end up
> sitting until the next periodic inform, which is usually hours.
>
> I've used some commercial ACS' and they have a background process that
> re-tires the CPE connection.  After a first initial failed request to check
> in for tasks, every 30-60 seconds this background watcher will re-ask the
> CPE to check, giving up after five minutes or so.
>
> Would a background task watcher be useful to any of you?
>
> I've coded up a simple fix for my installation and I'm wondering if it
> would be worth working on a proper pull request.
>
> Thanks,
> Spence
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.genieacs.com/pipermail/users/attachments/20170331/c4e63a5f/attachment.html>