How to delete an instance of an object based on a parameter
Dan Morphis
dan at milkcarton.com
Thu Oct 5 12:41:38 EDT 2017
You really need to look at the logs on the CPE. Its frustrating that CPEs
won't (usually) tell you what failed and why in the response message. Thats
all hidden away on the device log on the CPE.
-dan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Sergio Fernández <sergio19932 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thank you so much, Dan (as always), now I understand a little bit more
> about the best way to do it.
>
> In the end, it is causing a fault on my provision, but I think that is
> another problem.
>
> I think it could be solved assigning some more parameters to each of the
> WANs. For example, let's say I want the WAN with VLAN 100 to be configured
> IP_Routed (The parameter is, in this case,
> *InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.1.WANIPConnection.1.ConnectionType*).
> As it is not a sibling, how to assign it to the VLAN 100 and not to the
> VLAN 200?
>
> I am trying right now something like this:
>
> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.[]", null,
> {path: 2});
> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.*." +
> VendorPrefix + "WANGponLinkConfig.[VLANIDMark:100]", {path: 1}, {path:1});
> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.[" +
> VendorPrefix + "WANGponLinkConfig.VLANIDMark:100].WANIPConnection.*.[ConnectionType:IP_Routed]",
> {path: 1}, {path:1});
> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.*." +
> VendorPrefix + "WANGponLinkConfig.[VLANIDMark:200]", {path: 1}, {path:1});
> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.[" +
> VendorPrefix + "WANGponLinkConfig.VLANIDMark:200].WANIPConnection.*.[ConnectionType:IP_Routed]",
> {path: 1}, {path:1});
>
> But it is still faulting. This is what I am getting in the debugging log
> of the CPE (In bold, the important bits):
>
> # RESPONSE Thu Oct 05 2017 09:43:22 GMT+0200 (CEST)
> {"Server":"GenieACS/1.1.1","SOAPServer":"GenieACS/1.1.1","Content-Type":"text/xml;
> charset=\"utf-8\""}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <soap-env:Envelope xmlns:soap-enc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/
> encoding/" xmlns:soap-env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/
> 2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:cwmp="urn:dslforum-org:
> cwmp-1-2"><soap-env:Header><cwmp:ID soap-env:mustUnderstand="1">
> 15eeb7d2bf2100</cwmp:ID></soap-env:Header><soap-env:Body><cwmp:*AddObject*
> ><ObjectName>
> *InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.1.X_CT-COM_WANGponLinkConfig.*
> </ObjectName><ParameterKey/></cwmp:AddObject></soap-env:
> Body></soap-env:Envelope>
>
> # REQUEST Thu Oct 05 2017 09:43:22 GMT+0200 (CEST)
> {"host":"10.60.0.20:7547","user-agent":"BCM_TR69_CPE_04_
> 00","connection":"keep-alive","soapaction":"","cookie":"
> session=0b7cc0fcc91af6b1","content-type":"text/xml","
> content-length":"793"}
> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
> xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> xmlns:SOAP-ENC="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:cwmp="urn:dslforum-org:cwmp-1-2">
> <SOAP-ENV:Header>
> <cwmp:ID SOAP-ENV:mustUnderstand="1">15eeb7d2bf2100</cwmp:ID>
> </SOAP-ENV:Header>
> <SOAP-ENV:Body>
> <SOAP-ENV:Fault>
> <faultcode>Client</faultcode>
> <faultstring>CWMP fault</faultstring>
> <detail>
> <cwmp:*Fault*>
> <FaultCode>9003</FaultCode>
> <FaultString>*Invalid arguments*</FaultString>
> </cwmp:Fault>
> </detail>
> </SOAP-ENV:Fault>
> </SOAP-ENV:Body>
> </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Sergio Fernández Rubio - https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergiofdz/
> (+34) 687 016 994 <+34%20687%2001%2069%2094>
> CEO @ ACSdesk
> https://acsdesk.com
>
> 2017-10-04 20:05 GMT+02:00 Dan Morphis <dan at milkcarton.com>:
>
>> Close :)
>>
>> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.[]",
>> null, {path: 2}); //Tell Genie we need 2 instances
>> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.*." +
>> VendorPrefix + "WANGponLinkConfig.[VLANIDMark:100]", {path: 1},
>> {path:1}); //One instance will have the value of 100
>> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.*." +
>> VendorPrefix + "WANGponLinkConfig.[VLANIDMark:200]", {path: 1},
>> {path:1}); //Another instance will have the value of 200
>>
>> The CPE is creating a new connection device because you've told it to via
>> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.*WANConnectionDevice.[]",
>> null, {path: 2})*. One thing to keep in mind is you have to stop caring
>> about instance IDs because they can change. Care about what you want the
>> final state of the CPE to be.
>>
>> -dan
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Sergio Fernández <sergio19932 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've been trying to create a provisioning flow in order to start by only
>>> leaving 1 WAN Interface, with a fixed VLAN (that is pre-setted: for
>>> example, a VLAN with id 100 for TR069), and removing the rest of the WAN
>>> interfaces. After that is completed, I would add 2 or 3 WAN interfaces with
>>> other VLANs (for example, VLAN 200 for INTERNET, VLAN 300 for VoIP, VLAN
>>> 400 for IPTV... etc)
>>>
>>> I would like to know the exact condition to make it work without pain.
>>> Like:
>>>
>>> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.[]",
>>> null, {path: 1});
>>> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.1." +
>>> VendorPrefix + "WANGponLinkConfig.VLANIDMark", null, {value: "100"});
>>>
>>> (It works)
>>>
>>> But now, how do I add another VLAN? Because the next code isn't working
>>> for me:
>>>
>>> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.[]",
>>> null, {path: 2});
>>> declare("InternetGatewayDevice.WANDevice.1.WANConnectionDevice.2." +
>>> VendorPrefix + "WANGponLinkConfig.VLANIDMark", null, {value: "200"});
>>>
>>> Anyway, my CPE creates a WANConnectionDevice.5. .... and I don't know
>>> why.
>>>
>>> Thank you so much! Sorry for "reopening" the thread, but I think the
>>> answer to Angel would be one of the keys to solve my issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sergio Fernández Rubio - https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergiofdz/
>>> (+34) 687 016 994 <+34%20687%2001%2069%2094>
>>> CEO @ ACSdesk
>>> https://acsdesk.com
>>>
>>> 2017-03-06 20:05 GMT+01:00 Zaid Abdulla <zaid at genieacs.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 17:08 +0100, Àngel Wifibytes wrote:
>>>> > I'm trying to delete an instance of an object. In this case, I have a
>>>> > device with 3 WANConnectionDevice preconfigurated.
>>>>
>>>> This should help (v1.1 only): https://github.com/zaidka/genieacs/wiki/P
>>>> rovisions#creatingdeleting-object-instances
>>>> <https://github.com/zaidka/genieacs/wiki/Provisions#creatingdeleting-object-instances>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Zaid Abdulla <zaid at genieacs.com>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.genieacs.com
>>>> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.genieacs.com
>>> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.genieacs.com
>> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.genieacs.com/pipermail/users/attachments/20171005/1db94bae/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list