Two ACSs

[Petar Raickovic]

Hi Simon,

The idea behind two ACSs is to use one ACS for provisioning and the other
for periodical gathering of performance data (let's say that period would
be around 15mins). In this way the provisioning ACS would have much smaller
load and also the API queries passed to provisioning ACS wouldn't take much
time to execute and data gathering would be easier and faster.
Br
Pera

чет, 26. апр 2018. 22.20 Simon Ryf <simon.ryf at dualstack.ch> је написао/ла:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I don’t understand the use of splitting different cwmp-events to different
> instances, probably because it has not yet been explained why by Pera *
> *wink** ;-).
>
>
>
> However, I have had thoughts about load balancing and redundancy with
> GenieACS. As this thread is somewhat related here my question to Zaid / Dan:
>
>
>
> Do you see any issues having two (separate / with different IP’s)
> instances of cwmp, nbi & gui accessing the same mongoDB of GenieACS?
> I assume that since there is no CPE accessing both instances of cwmp at
> the same time, there is not going to be a write conflict within MongoDB –
> am I right?
>
>
>
> We use dockerized GenieACS (one container as GUI and another as
> CWMP/NBI/FS) for some time now quite successfully. Being able to scale that
> up having multiple instances of a container maybe even on different
> Bare-metals would be nice but I don’t make the effort of testing if you say
> that this could cause write conflicts on the mongoDB.
>
>
>
> *As a side note: I also thought of separating CWMP, NBI and FS going more
> in the direction of micro-services – however getting also reduced container
> sizes would mean to deal with npm and knowing what service is using what
> library. And I have yet to come across another language making such a
> painfully overcomplicated and complete mess regarding libs as node/js.
> (Sorry I had to say that). If someone did that already – please let me know
> :)*
>
>
>
> Br
>
> Simon
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.genieacs.com> on behalf of Dan Morphis
> <dan at milkcarton.com>
> *Reply-To: *Community support for GenieACS users <users at lists.genieacs.com
> >
> *Date: *Thursday, 26 April 2018 at 21:07
> *To: *Community support for GenieACS users <users at lists.genieacs.com>
> *Subject: *Re: Two ACSs
>
>
>
> Without having looked at any proxy, I’m saying off the top of my head it
> would take a custom proxy/code to make this work.
>
> -dan
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Petar Raickovic <pera.raickovic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> So you think that the thing is in the proxy? I was thinking of using
> HAproxy for this and setting it to foreword messages containing "4 VALUE
> CHANGE" to ACS1 and the others to ACS2 but i don't know if that would do
> the trick...
>
>
>
> чет, 26. апр 2018. 20.59 Dan Morphis <dan at milkcarton.com> је написао/ла:
>
> You would need a proxy with some custom code to make this work. You could
> write a proxy in your language of choice. But out of the box this is not
> possible.
>
> -dan
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Petar Raickovic <pera.raickovic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I agree that it is complex but I need to know if it is possible and if you
> have any suggestions on how to do it. As far as I have seen in TR069
> document I wpuld need some kind of a proxy in front of the ACSs as modem
> can have only one ACS...
>
>
>
> чет, 26. апр 2018. 20.41 Dan Morphis <dan at milkcarton.com> је написао/ла:
>
> Why? That sounds like needless complexity.
>
> -dan
>
>
> On Apr 26, 2018, at 11:40 AM, Petar Raickovic <pera.raickovic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yes that's right. I want to do a refresh of the device (updating
> parameters) with one ACS and a reboot with the other.
>
>
>
> чет, 26. апр 2018. 20.38 Zaid Abdulla <zaid at genieacs.com> је написао/ла:
>
> On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 09:29 +0200, Petar Raickovic wrote:
> > I have a question regarding GenieACS configuration. I would like to
> > use a proxy and two ACSs behind the proxy to manage all CPEs. So I
> > would like to be able to mark ACS requests in order to split the
> > traffic coming from CPEs inside the proxy using the same mark.
>
> Not sure I understand your question. It's the incoming HTTP requests
> from your CPEs that you want to distribute to your two ACS nodes.
>
> --
> Zaid Abdulla <zaid at genieacs.com>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.genieacs.com
> http://lists.genieacs.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.genieacs.com/pipermail/users/attachments/20180426/8a3e5acd/attachment.html>